VimIy微民網(wǎng)，讓世界傾聽微民的聲音！
設為首頁 | 加入收藏 | 網(wǎng)站地圖
原文：
Bill Sweetman ：China's New Stealth Fighter. Not a repeat from December 2010.
磚家：土鱉的新隱形機——不是2010年11月的火星帖。
The US defense secretary is on his way to Beijing. Time to unveil a new stealth fighter...
米防長正在去帝都的路上，適逢為新隱形機揭幕的時刻....
Short take-off and vertical landing has been one of the two driving requirements behind the Joint Strike Fighter design, the other being stealth.
追求短距及垂直起降能力(STOVL)是JSF的兩個驅動因素之一，之二便是隱形能力。
STOVL dictated the single engine, and the STOVL solution chosen for the F-35 demands a big vertical bay behind the cockpit, and a main engine located unusually far forward, to keep the driveshaft length within reason and to put the
lift-cruise nozzle in the right longitudinal location for balance.
STOVL采用了單發(fā)方案，使得球電的座艙后面安置了一個巨大的垂直的升力風扇艙室，發(fā)動機也突破常規(guī)地安置在更靠前的位置，好將傳動軸的長度限制在合理范圍內并與垂直噴嘴保持平衡。
This constrains the weapon-bay volume and shape, and effectively subdivides the bays into four zones - two AAM bays and two heavy store sections. As Amy Butler reports in Aviation Week this week, too, the weapon bays, wrapped around the engine, get hot and noisy.
這些都制約了飛機的武器艙的外形和大小，事實上把武器艙割裂為四個部分，兩個空空導彈彈倉，兩個重載荷彈倉。就如Amy Butler本周在航空周刊上報道的一樣，彈倉緊緊環(huán)繞于發(fā)動機周圍，承受著高溫和高震動的考驗。
If you ever wondered what a JSF might look without those constraints, we now have a live, physical example.
如果你猜想，要是JSF甩開這些包袱會是個啥樣，那我們現(xiàn)在正有一個活生生的例子擺在眼前。
Unfortunately...
倒霉的是。
..it's Chinese.
它是土鱉的。
One of the photos of the new Shenyang stealth fighter, apparently designated J-31, that appeared on Chinese defense websites over the weekend is such a colossal gimme that it has to have been deliberate. Direct head-on shot? Check.Commercially available aircraft tug? Check. Extreme telephoto, so that perspective effects are lost in the noise? Check.
這是一張新型的沈飛隱形戰(zhàn)機的照片，似乎叫J-31，周末呈現(xiàn)在中國的防務論壇上，這一如此大方的贈禮，只能說是經過精心的謀劃。正面免冠照？對了。商用的飛機牽引車？對了。超長焦鏡頭？以至于透視效果都淹沒在圖像噪點里？也對了。
?
Sheesh, guys, can't you make it a challenge?
靠，伙計，你能不能別玩我？
The J-31's wingspan is an F-35-like 37.5 feet, unless my Soviet-watching skills have deserted me. This makes it smaller than the F-22 and considerably smaller than the Chengdu J-20. A good early guess is that the engines are Klimov RD-93s - imported in large numbers for the JF-17 - with a Chinese-built engine to follow.
J-31跟球電相仿的翼展約為37.5英尺，除非我警惕的無產階級火眼金睛把我欺騙了。這使得該機小于F-22，更遠小于成飛J-20，初步穩(wěn)妥地猜測，發(fā)動機是克里莫夫RD93S，之前有為JF-17大量進口過，接下來會代之以土鱉國產發(fā)動機。
Turning to the side view of the jet, it looks as if the engines are installed to the rear of the bulkhead that carries the main landing gears. And with no lift fan bay to worry about, the designers have been able to install long weapon bays on the centerline: what will be interesting is how the inlet ducts are routed to optimize internal space.
轉到側面去看這架戰(zhàn)機，發(fā)動機似乎是裝置于起落架艙室的后部，而且沒有令人頭疼的升力風扇，設計者們便可在機體中央安置更長的武器彈倉:而進氣道該選擇何種路徑以便優(yōu)化內部空間，就會很有趣了。
Overall, the most important point is that the J-31 does not look like a competitor for the J-20 - but as a complement to it. Which, again, might point to the new fighter being a JSF to the J-20's F-22.
總而言之，最重要的一點是J-31看起來并非是J-20的挑戰(zhàn)者，更像是一個它的后援。這一點更說明這個新機型之于J-20，正如JSF之于F-22一樣。
And if you wonder about the detail similarities of the shape to the F-22 and F-35, remember this quote from 2010:
而如果你對它在細節(jié)上與F-22和F-35的相仿感到訝異時，別忘記引自2010年的這條消息：
In the past year (2009) alone, Lockheed Martin found “six to eight companies” among its subcontractors “had been totally compromised emails, their networks, everything” according to Lockheed Martin chief information security
officer Anne Mullins.
“僅在去年(2009)一年，洛馬就發(fā)現(xiàn)它的‘六到八個’分包商，‘已經完全失密了，從電郵往來、到網(wǎng)絡鏈接乃至一切’”，洛馬首席信息安全主管Anne Mullins如是說。瞬間2頁～～有木有人性啊。怎么感覺有點酸最后一句是天下無人不通共的節(jié)奏么-。-翻譯的頗有喜感。 Post by carsomyr (2012-09-17 10:08)
明明是一盤很大的麻將.“僅在去年(2009)一年，洛馬就發(fā)現(xiàn)它的‘六到八個’分包商，‘已經完全失密了，從電郵往來、到網(wǎng)絡鏈接乃至一切’”
天下無人不通共啊……
"思維特曼對J-31的評論(原創(chuàng)翻譯貼)"
你這個的原始貼在這里洛馬啥意思？ 那些分包商都被土共策反了？這股酸味不像是醋，更想是在豆?jié){里泡了三天的剩飯。對戰(zhàn)斗力表示堪憂啊
洛馬啥意思？ 那些分包商都被土共策反了？喂喂 最后一句啊喂�。�！
尾巴上那只鳥，好丑 這是打算給沈飛的4代姬找個美國爹么？澳洲的軍事實力也配談論別人.笑了洛克馬丁公司，美國F22-F35戰(zhàn)機的制造商andrei_sh
4:16 PM on 9/16/2012
This new fighter looks definitely good, much better than the J-20. The less they invent and more copy, the better result they get, Anyawy, my congratulations go to our chinese comrades.
這家新戰(zhàn)機看上去很不錯，要比J-20帥多了。好像他們創(chuàng)新少越少，抄襲越多的話得到的成果會越好啊。不論怎么說，我得向我們的中國同志們道喜。
Eric Palmer
5:26 PM on 9/16/2012
My sources tell me that part of the data that was downloaded in various compromise ops by the Chinese was the video about "maneuverability is irrelevant." and DAS. Because the video was so stupid-funny, it took down PLAAF email servers for a day or so because everyone was emailing it to their buddies. OK, I obviously made that up, but it is believable given the stupidity of some of our marketing pukes.
個人搜查到的資料告訴我有一部分被中國人盜竊的機密是騾馬的那個“機動性無用論”錄像。應為那個錄像實在是太傻太搞笑了，中國人民解放軍空軍的電子信箱的服務器都被搞垮了(解放軍叔叔忙著互相送玩笑信了)。當然，這段是我編的。不過想想我們那幫做推銷的傻瓜。。。個人覺得這個“笑話”還挺有真實性的。
Maersk
6:07 PM on 9/16/2012
Hi Eric, do you also have the video showing how the Chinese hacked into your azz and stealing your virginity? I am just curious.
你好Eric， 你有沒有中國黑客爆你菊花幫你破處的錄像��？我比較好奇啊。
Bill Sweetman, your soviet-watching skills definitely have deserted you. What you saw was a shemail and you thought it was a male. No wonder you've been depositing your package in a male box instead of a femail box.
比爾思維特曼，你的觀察能力的確不行了。你看到了一個女伴男裝的居然認為她是個男的。怪不得你老是把你的郵件放到郵箱里而不是“女箱”里。(這位好像喝多了)。
Eric Palmer
6:28 PM on 9/16/2012
The joys of nameless internet trolls.
無所事事的小屁孩又在網(wǎng)上找樂子了。
Maersk
6:55 PM on 9/16/2012
My source told me that you did have the video. Are you ashamed of yourself of how easy your azz was hacked and your virginity stolen?
我查到的資料很明確的說你的確有那些錄像。你是不是對黑客輕而易舉的把你爆菊破處而感到難為情啊？
Hardcore
6:54 PM on 9/16/2012
The Soviets where also accused of being copycats. I expect it be no more true the Chinese is.
以前很多人也認為蘇聯(lián)人經常剽竊西方。我認為中國人，和他們一樣，被冤枉了。
The basic configuration is a copy of a proven type for sure, like most modern "X" proposal is (but they could have chosen a better role model; the PAK-FA is a more advanced design).
Apart from that I expect it to be Chinese under the skin.
這架飛機的基本布局，和大部分四代機計劃一樣，肯定是拷貝現(xiàn)有四代機的(不過他們可以選擇一個更好的參照品；T-50就要比它先進很多)。
It goes without saying it will be cheaper and fly better than the JSF. The only consolation is that the Chinese will probably not export it (at least not close US allies) repeating the US mistake with the raptor. Too paranoid.
它肯定會比JSF便宜而且飛行性能會更棒。唯一能安慰我們的是中國人應該不會把它賣給別的國家(最起碼不會買個美國的盟國)。他們這樣做的話會重復美國人禁賣猛禽的錯誤。他們太偏執(zhí)了。
Still, every new Chinese fighter emerging into the light make the JSF ever more embarrassing.
無論怎么說，每一個新式中國戰(zhàn)斗機的出現(xiàn)都在狠狠的打F-35的臉！最后一句是·········天下無人不通共么··天下無人不通共的節(jié)奏= =